TO THOSE persons seeking discussion for Sundays coming forth in the lectionary, we offer a listing according to the three-year calendar. On the right-hand column of this page, please find the past corresponding year for lectionary years A, B, or C. And then search the appropriate month in each for a discussion concerning the gospel reading.
Tuesday, September 9, 2014
Forgiving Ethic!
THE Sixteenth Sunday after Pentecost brings us to
read once again from the Gospel According to Saint Matthew. Within this text,
we find instructions about forgiveness that was given to Christian
communities. The lesson reveals that we as Christians are to go beyond worldly standards…
Then Peter came up and said to him, “Lord, how often shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? As many as seven times?”
Jesus said to him, “I do not say to you seven times, but seventy times seven.
Therefore the kingdom of heaven may be compared to a king who wished to settle accounts with his servants. When he began the reckoning, one was brought to him who owed him ten thousand talents; and as he could not pay, his lord ordered him to be sold, with his wife and children and all that he had, and payment to be made.
So the servant fell on his knees, imploring him, ‘Lord, have patience with me, and I will pay you everything.’ And out of pity for him the lord of that servant released him and forgave him the debt.
But that same servant, as he went out, came upon one of his fellow servants who owed him a hundred denarii; and seizing him by the throat he said, ‘Pay what you owe.’ So his fellow servant fell down and besought him, ‘Have patience with me, and I will pay you.’ He refused and went and put him in prison till he should pay the debt. When his fellow servants saw what had taken place, they were greatly distressed, and they went and reported to their lord all that had taken place. Then his lord summoned him and said to him, ‘You wicked servant! I forgave you all that debt because you besought me; and should not you have had mercy on your fellow servant, as I had mercy on you?’ And in anger his lord delivered him to the jailers, till he should pay all his debt.
So also my heavenly Father will do to every one of you, if you do not forgive your brother from your heart.” (Matthew 18:21-35)
Our gospel writer reiterates that which had been laid out
to the early church about Christian forgiveness. This Matthean witness related to
the congregations previously that Jesus, when teaching his disciples how to
pray, stated that we should ask for forgiveness of debts (sins), just as we
have been forgiven (Matthew 6:12). However, as we read this... please be reminded that
Matthew addressed a community which had strong roots in Judaic legalism and
traditions. For this reason, we need to consider their predisposition. In
scripture, as represented by Peter, they had surely received guidance through the
Law of Moses. Peter quoted a Hebraic scriptural standard, but first note that
recompense for injury was stated as quite vindictive…
Lamech said to his wives: “Adah and Zillah, hear my
voice; you wives of Lamech, hearken to what I say: I have slain a man for
wounding me, a young man for striking me.If Cain is avenged
sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy-sevenfold.”
(Genesis 4:24)
Thus Peter’s statement about
forgiveness of debts was rooted in very early Hebrew tradition, for by stating the
“sevenfold” example we see it was even exceeded by that which was passed along by
rabbinical teachers of his own day. Those contemporary teachers stated that one was to
forgive only three times before grabbing someone by the throat and
hauling them into a legal hearing.
To set the stage for us, we first see evidenced in
Luke how Jesus called upon this sevenfold standard. He taught them saying...
“A certain creditor had two
debtors; one owed five hundred denarii, and the other fifty.When
they could not pay, he forgave them both. Now which of them will love him
more?” Simon answered, “The one, I suppose, to whom he forgave more.” And he
said to him, “You have judged rightly.” (Luke 7:41-42)
We see by this Lukan text that the ancient
sevenfold rule of thumb had been a concrete measure numerically used by Simon (Peter) and
also many others who sought to “exceed righteousness”. Put simply, they carefully measured justice! However, we note that Luke later recorded where Jesus addressed the disciples
about using their sinful, sliding scale. He radically stated what the Church is to do if the
offenses occurred in just one day’s time…
Take
heed to yourselves; if your brother sins, rebuke him, and if he repents,
forgive him; and if he sins against you seven times in the day, and turns to you seven times, and says, ‘I repent,’ you
must forgive him.” (Luke 17:3-5)
We repeat these
radical instructions here! Jesus stated clearly, “seven times in the day”. Thus it was that more
persons than Peter offered sevenfold as a standard; far greater persons in number had stated that justice demanded more than the three-fold forgiveness recommended by contemporary
rabbinical authorities, Therefore, Jesus called the infant Church to go much, much farther. You see, our Lord radicalized the amount stated in Peter’s self-answered question. Jesus cited a very radical
number of forgiveness instances to be made available. Then using a parable, our Lord gave the example of the
immense forgiveness of a king. He stated that the ruler forgave a debtor to the
tune of about six million dollars (by today’s count). This was done in spite of
accepted legalities that which would have imprisoned the man unto torture, so
that also his relatives would work long and hard to ransom him. The king did not attach all of his
possessions, nor enslave the man's family.
However, after
the abundant forgiveness was granted, the debtor did not pass along the grace provided. He
did not… as we call it today… pay it forward! The offender imprisoned a second, rather poor
man who owed him a mere sixteen dollars. He grabbed the man by the throat, a
contentious but legally appropriate action of the day… and hauled him before a
judge. He had the offender imprisoned because of the debt. In this alarming
double standard we see how justice was tilted... and therein lay the breakaway mandate
of the early Christian church.
You see, a
subtle shift takes place in the dialog of the parable... by those who were “greatly distressed”
( Greek – elypethesan sphroda ) by
the action of the first man. These went to their “own” lord to report the malady. Thus we find in parable
that this particular lord was rather ambiguously portrayed... as either the original king, or could yet be
another lord. If we accept the latter example, then this "other" lord was in a position so that he could
influence the master of the first debtor. If that was so, then we are called to ask, “Is
this an early expression of Trinitarian dogma?” because one who was King could be influenced only by another who was also King? To be sure, whether you view this discourse as historically the words of Jesus as I do... or our own interpretative apostolic leanings, I consider that this may have indeed been an expression of
theological doctrine emerging from the church of Matthew, possibly written down from oral tradition some fifty years after
the crucifixion and Resurrection. Where they being asked to forgive Jews which had betrayed them to the Romans during times of persecution? We ask why this scribal necessity? Did the first debtor represent the Jews in the Church, and the latter debtor the Gentiles?
Go
Beyond the Law…
Note that in the parable, thus hearing of the ingrate’s actions, the king immediately
gathered the first debtor up once again. Having been told of the servant's hardness of heart, he issued a much
more profound measure of punishment. Therefore, I consider that this text
revealed that Jesus warned his early disciples clearly about the will of the
Father. The witness of Christians had been made substantively over against those within
the infant church community who would simply adhere to former confines of the Mosaic
Law or accepted rabbinical practice. Were they being stingy with forgiveness? Were they bring asked to forgive people who had denied Jesus as Lord during the persecutions from Nero and other Roman authorities?. We thus may ask, “Was it that some persons stubbornly kept the
traditions of Israel... or favored their rabbinical teachers.., who were being yet too
stingy in passing along the radical good news to converts about the superlative abundant
grace received?”Finding this
subliminal trace within the parable dialog as to foundational
Trinitarian relationship, as expressed through our Lord’s use of “king” and “lord”,
I find that we need to pay very close attention and
pay our own due.
For the church of Matthew, we see that it was likely that the Holy
Spirit had already established a pattern. We of the modern Church have thus inherited
an existential model for our own ministry from this gospel writing. For any church in the
Spirit, limitless forgiving compassion is a goal to be expressed. We are to be
a gospel declaring community, no matter the worldly status of the recipient nor their personal faith history. We
are not to cave in… settling for such as Israelite, Sharia
law, or national law. Remember, even in its perfect form the Law only condemns. It cannot deliver the debtor! The Church is thus called
to be separatist. The character laid out for the whole Church sets our Lord’s disciples
apart as having a quality that is different than the rest of the world.
You
see, expansive forgiveness and mercy is a divine act of God not to be ignored,
nor exploited by the people of God.Inexhaustible
forgiveness and mercy has been purchased for all who believe by the body and
blood of our Lord and repent of their sinfulness. Invitation to the forgiving feast in the divine courtyard is therefore extended
freely to rich and poor alike... to the previously established and the new. Let the Church subsequently be warned that it is not to lay a
burden upon anyone else that we are unwilling to shoulder. We who have received
immeasurable forgiveness are called to forgive others immeasurably. Does this
open the Church to challenge and abuse? Indeed yes! So it was done to our innocent Lord
as he bore our sins to the cross. So it was also in the days of Matthew’s
writing.., and so it is to be in the modern Christian church as we wade through
this turbulent age. We are a people still called to bear the cross of our Lord.
May the Holy Spirit guide our walk into the future days of witness.
No comments:
Post a Comment